Monday, January 16, 2012


"Shut your mouth - War is Hell!"

And he's not the only one with balls - look who else has grown a pair:

Progressives Attack Dana Loesch For 'Cheering' Marines Pissing On Dead Taliban

Me, I say what's the big deal? Of course, I said that over the Abu Ghraib thing - worse things happen at frat parties. Proof of the pudding is that none of the soldiers indicted in the Abu Ghraib scandal were convicted for torture; sentences were handed down for taking souvenir photographs of prisoners - yes that's illegal under the Geneva Conventions - and the catch-all blanket charge 'prisoner abuse'. I was in Germany when Abu Ghraib broke and it was a scream listening to the Germans - of all people - getting all high and mighty and talking about atrocities. Like, they should know.

Let me go on the record here once more by endorsing the Blackjack Pershing technique - the Gold Standard of Muslim Terrorist Corpse Desecration.

Prior to World War I, General Pershing served in the Philippines, during the Moro Insurrection. At that time there were a number of terrorist attacks on the United States forces by Muslim extremists.

So General Pershing captured 50 Moro terrorists and had them tied to posts for execution. He then had his men bring in two pigs and slaughter them in front of the now horrified terrorists.

Muslims detest pork because they believe pigs are filthy animals. Some of them simply refuse to eat it, while others wont even touch pigs at all, nor any of their by-products. To them, eating or touching a pig, its meat, its blood, etc, is to be instantly barred from paradise (and those virgins) and be doomed to Hell.

The soldiers then soaked their bullets in the pigs blood, and proceeded to execute 49 of the terrorists by firing squad. The soldiers then dug a big hole, dumped in the terrorists bodies and covered them in pig blood, entrails, etc. They let the 50th man go. And for the next forty-two years, there was not a single Muslim extremist attack anywhere in the world.

THIS IS A WAR, ladies, not a sporting event, and the enemy we're up against wants to kill EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US. To make it even MORE interesting, this enemy is not playing by anybody's rule book. This war is going to go on from now until the Second Coming and it doesn't matter to them a whit whether or not we follow the Law of Land Warfare. The fact that we do only serves to justify our treatment of captive terrorists to the rest of the world. Never mind the fact that the rest of the world equates Guantanamo to Auschwitz.

While we're on the subject - I've read the Geneva Convention, cover to cover, and the minimal requirements for a military tribunal for enemy prisoners accused of criminal acts - before or after their capture - is an officer to read the charges; this is the reason it is called a 'drumhead tribunal'. No mention of a judge, jury, or a legal defense - these are all legal niceties we provide in order to make it more palatable to the political class. I don't think there is any doubt that the terrorist tactics of the Taliban and al Qaeda enemy are criminal. Sentencing may be no harsher than the laws of the warring power under which the prisoners are being held - yes that means the death sentence may be handed out.

Nothing in there about dipping bullets in pig's blood, and when you think about it, urinating on corpses looks pretty weak compared to burying terrorists under a pile of pig's entrails.

"That's my story and I'm sticking to it" - STORMBRINGER SENDS

Today's Bird HERE


  1. Hey SB,

    The most amusing part of this non-story for me has been the hand-wringing in the media and the almost total support by the public for the Marines.

    As aQ and Taliban wear no uniforms are they even subject to the Geneva Convention? Protocol 1 of the GC says "Articles 43 and 44 clarify the military status of members of guerrilla forces. Combatant and prisoner of war status is granted to members of dissident forces when under the command of a central authority. Such combatants cannot conceal their allegiance; they must be recognizable as combatants while preparing for or during an attack."

    Fuck the possible Intel, let's just kill them where we find them.

  2. As much as I love the Blackjack Pershing story,it is my understanding that it is, alas, apocryphal. But it is valuable and instructive anyways. I long for a Commander-in-Chief with the gonads, spine, and WISDOM to treat these "insurgents" just as what they are: illegal combatants (or, if you will, guerillas), assassins, and saboteurs. And thus, not entitled to legal protections. They would be speedily tried by a military tribunal, and then executed. Their remains would be summarily buried without religious observance. Desecration of the corpses would be allowed, even encouraged. (Even the "unsubstantiated rumor" of defilement would be useful!)

    Just wondering: does a defiled Islamic corpse mean that the deceased's soul is denied "paradise?" I wonder if that would diminish the jihadists' recruiting rates? (!!)