Wednesday, August 18, 2010

WIKILEAKS TRAITOR UPDATE




"SUICIDE WATCH" has been ordered on PFC Manning - and gay activist - who is accused of leaking thousands of sensitive military documents to a left-wing web site, has been held in solitary confinement at the Quantico Marine Corps base in Virginia since arriving in the U.S. from Kuwait late last month. Meanwhile investigators probe damage done in Wikileaks case - Michigan Congressman wants G.I. to face Death Penalty - "Try him for treason" says Mike Rogers - Feds hunt for pint-sized private's civilian co-conspirators - info leak called worst since the Pentagon Papers 40 years ago.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) told a local radio station in his home state that "people will likely be killed" because of the information Manning allegedly leaked. "That's pretty serious. If they (the Army) don't charge him with treason, they ought to charge him with murder." The congressman based his statement on his belief that the 22 year-old private "put soldiers at risk who are fighting for our country."

Read more HERE


But WAIT there's MORE:





PFC Bradley Manning - the pint-sized traitor - is also a gay activist and supports "progressive" causes - it's all on Bradley's FACEBOOK page, that is, if it's still available online to see.

22 year-old "Lindsey Graham look-alike" posted pictures of himself protesting at a gay rights rally. A member of Virginia Young Democrats, the Oklahoma native lists "The Rachel Maddow Show" as his favorite television program, and under the category of OTHER on his page, supports "Repeal the Ban - End "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," QueerToday.com, gay marriage, and "Boystown."

Manning was said to be upset after break-up with "boy friend" - choice quotes: "Take me for what I am or face the consequences," "I'm not a piece of equipment, -


. . . uh, you are NOW Sock-Puppet Boy . . .


Treasonous soldier calls "Military Intelligence: An oxymoron."


Like . . . WOW . . . you're an original thinker, too . . . the first time I heard that one I laughed so hard I fell off my dinosaur . . .



I've got only one thing to say to all you people out there calling for this young man to fry in the electric chair:

The Army doesn't execute people in the electric chair.

They use the hangman's rope.

They haven't done it since about 1961, though, and it's unlikely as hell that Obama-Lama-Ding-Dong would sign off on the execution order as Commander-in-Cheif . . . still it's nice to imagine this 90-pound weakling with a sandbag tied around his ankles to get enough inertia going to snap his scrawny neck . . . .

Just wanted to put that out there . . .

- SEAN LINNANE SENDS


.

5 comments:

  1. My ww2 vets uncle told me before I shipped off to Parris Island, "Remember one thing. You are a piece of ordinance. An expensive, but in the end, expendable piece of ordinance, who use is to accomplice a objective. Hope for two things. One, a commanding officer who knows not to waste ordinance, and that God has ordained a time for your passing, and pray it is for you to die old in bed, surrounded by the ones you love."

    Any person entering the military would be wise to contemplate these words. If this offends you, or your against being a machine or some such non sense, better stay at Bob's big boy and sling burgers...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well put Toaster. Another aspect of this is that having been an expendable item for 30 years now, I consider myself lucky. Not because of all the dangerous places and things I've been exposed to but, because if not for the the US Army, I'd have died a long time ago. The irony is that many concern themselves with the prospect of dieing when they join the military and I've come to appreciate the opposite, and I doubt I'm alone......jd

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm with tongtong on this one. The Chinese would have already sold off his kidneys and liver. I had no idea "don't ask don't tell" also covers loony left wing, I mean ANTI AMERICAN politics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This guy saw injustice, and shared this with others. That would be called courage in most situations. How's that a crime? A man does what he must — in spite of personal consequences, in spite of obstacles and dangers, and pressures — and that is the basis of all human morality. This 'fag boy' fights for the rights of people - gay or straight - that shouldn't matter. (Some of) you guys are clearly prejudiced agaist homosexuals. Says more about you then about him. It's quite clear to me you guys can't think outside of your "government teachings", logically, you entrust your employer with your life, your mind, in some cases they "saved" your life, so it's logical for you to trust them. I don't. I can trust individual people, but I can never trust an organisation, since an organisation will always fight for it's survival even if the people in it know their actions are wrong they will not act, since their livelihood depends on it. Shouldn't negative actions by government be publicized? I can remember a speech by John F. Kennedy that promotes just that: The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ok so it is all about exposing secrets...where is the secrets for the other side? if you can't answer that then you don't truly want secrets revealed just to undermine the USA and jump on the hate/ignorant bandwagon. how soon people forget, or just refuse to learn how the coldwar was really won, hint: wasn't done by lil spoiled kid throwing a temper tantrum!

    ReplyDelete